You
Are A TRAITOR!
-anonymous
emailer |
Hi.
Ever since I started posting these Propaganda
Posters online, I've gotten tons of mail asking
who I am and what my problem is.
My name is Micah Wright. I'm a writer for
film, television, videogames and graphic novels.
Like most people, I was horrified by the events
of 9/11/01, but unlike George W. Bush, I'm
not willing to throw away our Bill of Rights
in order to feel "safe."
I'm also an ex-Army Ranger and a combat veteran,
so don't come whining to me that I'm a traitor
unless you've seen the elephant, okay? (hint:
if you don't know what that means, this means
I don't want hate mail from you -- you aren't
qualified to judge me or my devotion to this
country.)
If you just can't control yourself and feel
you must send me your poorly-spelled hate
mail, please send a real email address along
with it. Few things are as irritating as sending
intelligent, reasoned email back to you, only
to find that you're hiding behind a fake name,
a fake email address and the anonymity of
the internet and your mom's basement. I'm
here, my name is here, my photo is here. You
should be as brave.
|
|
Don't
Question Bush! |
|
|
The Traitor Revealed |
Shifty eyes. Black
clothing. Unkempt beard. SIDEBURNS! This creep
must be up to something. Maybe someone should
pick him up for a little illegal permanent detention,
not allow him access to a lawyer and give him
some "voluntary" re-education about what it
means to be a "Murrkan"
("Murrka" is GW Bush's preferred
pronounciation of "America," as if he's trying to turn it into
a Corporate Brand Name: God Bless Murrka™)
|
A
Coup d'Etat in a Pitiful Third-World Country
Imagine that you read of an
election occurring somewhere in the Third
World in which the self-declared winner
was the son of the former prime minister
and that former prime minister was himself
the former head of that nation's secret
police (CIA).
Imagine that the self-declared winner lost
the popular vote but won based on some colonial
holdover from the nation's past (electoral
college) .
Imagine that the self-declared winner's
'victory' turned on disputed votes cast
in a province governed by his brother.
Imagine that the poorly drafted ballots
of one district, a district heavily favoring
the self-declared winner's opponent, led
thousands of voters to vote for the wrong
candidate.
Imagine that members of that nation's most
despised caste, fearing for their lives/livelihoods,
turned out in record numbers to vote in
near-universal opposition to the self-declared
winner's candidacy.
Imagine that hundreds of members of that
most-despised caste were intercepted on
their way to the polls by state police operating
under the authority of the self-declared
winner's brother.
Imagine that six million people voted in
the disputed province and that the self-declared
winner's 'lead' was only several hundred
votes — fewer, certainly, than the
vote counting machines' margin of error.
Imagine that the self-declared winner and
his political party opposed a more careful
by-hand inspection and re-counting of the
ballots in the disputed province or in its
most hotly disputed district.
Imagine that the self-declared winner was
himself the governor of a major province,
which had the worst human rights record
of any province in his nation and which
actually led the nation in executions .
Imagine that a major campaign promise of
the self-declared winner was to appoint
like-minded human rights violators to lifetime
positions on the high court of that nation.
Imagine that a majority of judges in the
high court in the disputed province eventually
and courageously decreed that "In close
elections the necessity for counting all
legal votes becomes critical," and
"legal votes sufficient to place in
doubt the election results have been rejected
in this case," and ordered votes that
had been missed by the counting machines
to be counted by hand, but that on the following
day this completion of the count was stopped
by a majority of judges in the high court
in the nation in response to an "emergency"
petition by the self-declared winner.
Imagine that those judges in the high court
of the nation who were members of the same
political party as the self-declared winner,
forming a 5-4 majority, then concocted a
convoluted legal pretence enabling them
to order all counting of votes to cease,
thereby handing the presidency to the self-declared
winner despite the fact that the majority
of the voters in the nation had chosen the
opposing candidate and that had the vote
counting been allowed to continue in the
disputed province the opposing candidate
would likely have won there also.
None of us would deem such an election to
be representative of anything other than
the self-declared winner's will-to-power
— with, in fact, the final act being
a barely-disguised coup d'etat. All
of us, I imagine, would wearily turn the
page thinking that it was another sad tale
of political corruption in some strange
land, far away.
Welcome to Murrka™, the World's Newest
Third-World Country, complete with a government
chosen by Judicial Coup!
|
|
|
|
No
Questions! |
by
an UnMurrkan™ |
George
Bush has finally rammed Joe Lieberman's new Department
of Homeland Security through Congress. It passed
with overwhelming support, mostly because it made
Congress seem like it was doing "something"
about the threat of terrorism.
Meanwhile, in the Real World, this new Department
does NOTHING. It is just another layer of bureaucracy
on top of our existing flawed federal departments.
Let's not forget that the FBI and CIA had ample
warning of the impending 9/11 attacks. The same
people who ignored the 9/11 warnings and threat
assessments are STILL in charge, only now they have
a new boss they can pass the buck to: Tom Ridge.
This Department of Homeland Security is the biggest
panacea sugar-pill we've conceived of yet in our
collective call to have the Federal government do
"Something" about terrorism.
Seriously, why not call this new Department what
it really is, The Department of Domestic Intelligence
Gathering? That's what it is, right? An agency to
spy on American Citizens? An agency designed to
root out "subversives" and "terrorists"
amongst us?
Is it just me, or did we already go through this
in the 1950s? I'm reminded of HUAC, the red-hunting
FBI, blacklisting and much more. For a glimpse of
our future, look how well our last foray into "watch
your neighbor... he made be a Red" turned out.
Oh, right, the last time the FBI turned its focus
onto hunting Reds (i.e. Domestic Terrorists), the
Mafia came to power in this country. Who will we
be ignoring this time while we're scouring our colleges
for suspicious UnMurrkans™?
Incidentally, while we're on the subject, what's
with the word "Homeland?" Seriously, did
ANYONE ever refer to America as "the Homeland"
before 9/11? Suddenly it was everywhere, reminding
us at all times of the NAZIS and their beloved "Fatherland."
Is that what we are becoming? Maybe. After all,
Bush and Lieberman have now created our own Gestapo
with the power to detain Citizens indefinitely with
no evidence and no right to counsel.
And here I thought that George Orwell's "1984"
could never happen...
|
|
|